What wealthy person is the least deserving of their fortune?
Post your answer in the LEAVE A COMMENT section below. I’m not the boss of you, though. Don’t write anything for all I care! You deserve to get paid for every comment you create . . . but you won’t. Sorry!
. . .here are my thoughts.
What wealthy person is the least deserving of their fortune?
Listen . . . it’s really hard to say that anyone doesn’t “deserve” their money. But I have to answer the question, right? For the first few years that Full House was on the air back in the late ‘80s, I had no idea that Michelle Tanner was played by twins. The credits listed the kid as “Mary-Kate Ashley Olsen.” You got it dude, they needed twins to skirt the child labor laws. Since then they have both amassed ungodly wealth. I mean, Puh-lease, they each did half the acting, thus should each have only half their current wealth. And what’s with the show’s name? When I hear “Full House,” I think of a pair along with three of a kind—and hopefully winning a monster pot. I’ll give them the Olsen twins as the pair (even though they didn’t play twins on the show). There were 3 male adults raising the girls, but No way, Jose! can you call them three of a kind. If you try to, You’re in big trouble, mister, because there’s still two older sisters unaccounted for in this attempt to make a Full House.
If you use money that is inherited to earn more money of your own and do something good with it, then I don’t see any problem with that. We never had to worry about that. Lol
Any first generation wealth deserve their wealth. Second generation and beyond don’t deserve a dime but if course will sit back and ride on daddy’s coat tails. I don’t begrudge the descendants but I think they need to participate to deserve it. Any wealth someone gets legally and works hard deserves it.
Well put.