What wealthy person is the least deserving of their fortune?
Post your answer in the LEAVE A COMMENT section below. I’m not the boss of you, though. Don’t write anything for all I care! You deserve to get paid for every comment you create . . . but you won’t. Sorry!
. . .here are my thoughts.
What wealthy person is the least deserving of their fortune?
Listen . . . it’s really hard to say that anyone doesn’t “deserve” their money. But I have to answer the question, right? For the first few years that Full House was on the air back in the late ‘80s, I had no idea that Michelle Tanner was played by twins. The credits listed the kid as “Mary-Kate Ashley Olsen.” You got it dude, they needed twins to skirt the child labor laws. Since then they have both amassed ungodly wealth. I mean, Puh-lease, they each did half the acting, thus should each have only half their current wealth. And what’s with the show’s name? When I hear “Full House,” I think of a pair along with three of a kind—and hopefully winning a monster pot. I’ll give them the Olsen twins as the pair (even though they didn’t play twins on the show). There were 3 male adults raising the girls, but No way, Jose! can you call them three of a kind. If you try to, You’re in big trouble, mister, because there’s still two older sisters unaccounted for in this attempt to make a Full House.
Discover more from UrProbablyRight
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
If you use money that is inherited to earn more money of your own and do something good with it, then I don’t see any problem with that. We never had to worry about that. Lol
Any first generation wealth deserve their wealth. Second generation and beyond don’t deserve a dime but if course will sit back and ride on daddy’s coat tails. I don’t begrudge the descendants but I think they need to participate to deserve it. Any wealth someone gets legally and works hard deserves it.
Well put.